Essential News of Today, Collective Intelligence of Tomorrow

Calpers May Sell Some Land Holdings After 31% Decline

Tue, Jun 10, 2008

Featured, Homebuilding

Source: Bloomberg

The California Public Employees’ Retirement System, the largest U.S. public pension fund, may sell part of its $2 billion in residential land holdings after the investments lost 31 percent last year amid falling home prices and forecasts of further declines reports Bloomberg.

Sacramento-based Calpers hired Morgan Stanley to review seven land deals it made with joint-venture partners and real-estate advisers, said fund spokeswoman Pat Macht. The fund may decide to sell some of the land, purchased to develop new homes, or renegotiate the partnerships.

“Calpers is doing a case-by-case review, and of course there could be some restructuring,” Macht said in an interview. “There could be some selling. We could hold some. As each partnership is reviewed, there could be a variety of dispositions.”

Share This Article:

  • E-mail this story to a friend!
  • Print this article!
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Google
  • Mixx
  • TwitThis
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
,

3 Comments For This Post

  1. Gary Says:

    If Calpers, a large pension fund manager, is looking to sell or restructure their land holdings, what does this signal for the smaller investor in real estate?

    I think real estate developers are going to have a harder time securing investors for their projects.

    What we are going to see is widespread stagnation in land development.

  2. Mary Says:

    I concur. If real estate developers cannot secure investors then they will not have the equity in place to form the deal, which then means they won’t be able to qualify for construction loans. Stagnation, indeed.

  3. John Says:

    I disagree. No need to be alarmist. Calpers is considering restructuring, which means they aren’t going to automatically sell. Investors are still investing. Perhaps at lower amounts but they are still investing. We are heading for possibly a decreae in real estate development but not widespread stagnation.

Tell us what you think