Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac have been seized by the U.S. government in a dramatic step to shore up national and global credit markets. Rather than a single equity infusion, treasury Secretary Henry Paulson announced four separate measures to shore up the ailing mortgage giants: (1) Form a conservatorship to manage daily operations and install new leadership (2) Agreement to cover all loses stemming from mortgage defaults, and in return receive preferred stock in each company (3) Creation of secured credit facility for Fannie, Freddie, and Federal Home Loan Banks (4) Purchase of Mortgage Backed Securities to stabilize pricing and add liquidity to frozen secondary market
According to the Mortgage Banker’s Association, 9.2% of outstanding single family home mortgages were at least a month overdue as of the end of the second quarter. With defaults and foreclosures only expected to rise, it is questionable if Fannie or Freddie would survive without intervention. The two GSEs own or guarantee almost half of the $12 trillion in U.S. home loans outstanding, so without a doubt, Fannie and Freddie meet the test of being too big to fail. Yet government intervention and the risk to U.S. taxpayers is at the heart of criticism of Fannie and Freddie in their current forms. Alan Greenspan criticized the inherent incompatibility of their business models: on one hand they promote affordable American home ownership, yet on the other hand they must maximize shareholder returns. To accomplish this, they borrowed at almost risk free rates due to their quasi governmental status, and then lent at market rates. Furthermore, they never were required to meet the capital reserve standard of private competitors, and were only required to maintain about $75 billion to support their $5.3 trillion portfolio. Fannie and Freddie maintained extensive lobbying operations in Washington in order to keep their mandate to stay in business in spite of the risks their leverage implied.
Warren Buffet commented that “Secretary Paulson has made exactly the right decision for the country. He is minimizing the problem of moral hazard and maximizing the benefits for the housing market and for the smooth functioning of financial markets.”
Bush administration officials argued that Fannie and Freddie are too deeply embedded in the economy to allow them to founder. Indeed, many of the measures might be considered too little, too late if Fannie and Freddie became further compromised.
The question is what impact such sweeping measures will have on the housing markets. The new measures are expected to reduce the cost of borrowing and to bolster housing demand. A look at the S&P Case-Shiller U.S. National Home Price Index begs the question of whether home prices have further to fall. The index began the decade at 100, and by Q2 2006 the index reached a peak of 189.93. Now, the index has fallen to 155.32 - still over fifty percent greater than valuations of only eight years ago. See the Real Estate Flux prediction market here.
Bloomberg | Rebecca Christie and Dawn Kopecki | September 7, 2008
“Our economy and our markets will not recover until the bulk of this housing correction is behind us,” Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson, who engineered the takeover along with Federal Housing Finance Agency Director James Lockhart, said in Washington today. “Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are critical to turning the corner.”

8. September 2008
1 Comment