A rash of commercial foreclosure news has hit the markets, including a Deutsche Bank loan on The Drake property in New York, a Gramercy Capital loan on Cupertino Square in Silicon Valley, and the Riverton House project in Harlem. Yet these are examples of mismanagement and overleverage at the height of the market rather than a significant new trend in commercial foreclosure rates. According to Bloomberg and REIS data, the US market with the highest commercial foreclosure rate in 2Q 2008 was Chicago at 0.34% - hardly a significant trend.
Take for instance the Cupertino Square mall in Silicon Valley - mall owners took out a $195 million construction loan from Gramercy Capital two years ago at the peak of the cycle. Now that markets and mall operations have contracted, and presumably because the project couldn’t obtain further financing, Gramercy is looking to seize assets and make its investors whole. This is poor strategy, not a sign that responsible retail operators will start defaulting at any significant rate.
Another sterling example of an overextension is the foreclosure by Deutsche Bank on the $510 million loan collateralized by The Drake in New York City, part of the remnants of the Macklowe portfolio. If Macklowe’s strategy at the time of the Drake acquisition wasn’t predicated upon capital appreciation, with the market already at a high water mark, this would not be a story today. But otherwise, it is a spectacular flameout that is read into for signs of a growing trend in commercial foreclosures. Yet the reality is that commercial foreclosures are still at very low rates.
5. September 2008
0 Comments